Text and photos by Ian Hall
Trogon photos by John & Jemi Holmes
Not every day is a trogon day but sometimes when you head into the forest there is a feeling of expectation that you’ll see a trogon. Of course in those circumstances you never see one and it’s when you least expect it that they put in an appearance.
This trogon day started out like any other. I packed up my laptop at 4pm as usual and got ready for a walk in the forest. There is usually a little motivational inertia to overcome before going out, but today the light was good and it didn’t take me long to get my shoes on and tuck trousers into leech proof socks. Equipped with camera and binoculars I ducked through the fronds of fern and ginger into the cooler light under the canopy.
I paused to watch a flycatcher that was making looping forays over the water from the handrail of the footbridge. I’ve seen him many times before so I stepped onto the bridge and frightened him away.
The first Trogon was sitting in a patch of afternoon sunlight, his bright red breast feathers seemed to shine. He didn’t seem concerned by my presence and continued to make a curious trilling call. Every time he did so he would shuggle his white edged tail feathers. Shows like that don’t last long and he was soon gone. Amazing how easily something so bright and red can disappear.
I wasn’t much further along when I was arrested by an indignant squawk. I didn’t see him at first, surprising considering how bright and red he was. This was a different species but another male again. Off he went upriver and I started to move on. I hadn’t made two steps before I heard the squawk again. So it wasn’t the daddy who’d made the noise. She gave her position away by flying into another tree across the river. Females are more of a ginger colour and just as attractive for it – I won’t be accused of being ginger-ist! We checked each other out for a couple of minutes before she got bored and chased off upriver after her partner.
The sun was still catching the trees on the ridge above me so I pushed on up the now indistinct trail. There was not too much chance of getting lost because I still had the river as a guide. Nonetheless I started to take note of landmarks as I went; the tree with tentacle roots, the tree with stilt roots, the large Agathis tree with the bulge and the tree stump the shape of the Eiffel Tower. I paused by a tributary stream to photograph a wild ginger flower. Whilst doing so a babber started scolding me from the undergrowth. Most babblers fall into the category of ‘small brown bird’ and are usually unidentifiable unless you see them in good light and happen to catch them singing at the same time. There was no chance of this fella singing for me and the light on the valley floor was gloomy.
I now had a choice, either to follow the river closely into what might become a gorge, or to try to avoid the gorge by climbing higher up the side of the valley. The trees were more open there so I opted for the climb. There was no path so I followed the way of least resistance. The under storey of primary forest is surprisingly open but there are still plenty of things to avoid, in particular the barbed fronds of rattan that the rangers call duri. Caution is also needed in reaching for small tree trunks or vines with which to steady yourself, many of them are covered in spines.
At the point where I rejoined the river my watch said 5.30 and I knew I had to turn round if I was to get back to the camp before dark. I began to tick off the landmarks as a challenge to try to remember which one was next. The only problem was that there was no next landmark where I expected it to be. I had re-climbed the hill above the gorge and successfully started the descent but I was now on a flat area which I didn’t remember.
I know how easy it is to descend from a hill in the wrong direction. In this case the hill was still in the right place in relation to the river so I decided to continue. A landmark would really be good though. My pace quickened. The gloom settled thicker around me and the six o’clock cicada was singing in full force.
The danger of quickening your pace is that you are more likely to trip on a tree root or get hooked by some duri. I forced myself to slow down. As long as the six o’clock cicada was still going I was doing fine. They stop when it becomes night.
I patiently rearranged some duri fronds so that I could step through the gap and over a log that I recognised. I put the binoculars away; there would be no further use for them. The undergrowth opened up intermittently into a trail and I stepped up the pace.
Once back on the trail I started practising ‘walking without looking where you’re going’. This is a technique which the rangers evidently use because how else would they be able to spot all the plants and wildlife whilst on the move? When I’m trekking I see nothing except where I’m going to place my foot next. I’m determined that this will change. At a glance I memorised the trail for the next 10 metres and lifted my chin up high.
I know that you’re thinking that I would fall flat on my face and I too was surprised not too.
At the faster walking pace the cooler evening air lifted the sweat from my neck. The space between the trees opened up in front of me and I felt the sounds and the presence of the forest closing in just as tightly behind me.
I glanced at the next section of trail and lifted my head again. I moved faster still, feeling the forest tingling at the back of my head as I passed.
I was at the bridge. Careful it’s always slippery! I slipped along the last two boards without breaking rhythm. The tree trunks were now barely more solid than the darkness between them. The strangler fig on the big old dipterocarp still had some definition. It took three paces to pass and then I was walking between the gingers where the wild pigs had been digging. In the Camp clearing the trees were seen only in silhouette and the six o’clock cicada was silent.
Related posts
Tags: Agathis, Bird Conservation, Bird Watching, Borneo, Cicada, Malaysia, Maliau Basin, Rainforest, Sabah, Trogon
Here’s a case study about greenwashing the envrionmental impacts of tourism. In this story, imagine I am the sustainability manager of a resort hotel which is keen to do the right thing by practising responsible tourism.
I learn of a laundry detergent supplier who claims that their product is environmentally friendly and think Great! we can use this product and advertise the fact in our green marketing.
As a hotel I am a consumer of laundry detergents and I need to be able to verify that this product is truly green. If I don’t and the claims turn out to be spurious then I am guilty of propagating the greenwashing. In my position this is made more significant because I am not the end of the chain. I am selling on the green image to my guests and in doing so I am setting a standard for what is green.
Being diligent, I compose a letter to the supplier to reassure myself that the product is genuinely environmentally friendly. i.e is made only from organic ingredients and contains no Phosphates, synthetic surfactants, optical brighteners etc etc.
“Dear Demanding Customer” the would be environmentally friendly supplier wrote, “I have ascertained that my product could not meet your requirement of biodegradable as they are not made of organic ingredients. However, we can claim that it is environmental friendly where it doesn’t emit harmful substance to the environment.”
Immediately I sense that the supplier either doesn’t know what he is talking about or is trying to hoodwink me.
“Dear Detergent Man” I questioned, “What do you mean by ‘do not emit harmful substance to the environment’? What are the ingredients of your products? Does it contain phosphate, chlorine, LAS, SLS and optical whiteners? If so, then we are unfortunately not interested in the products. If not, I would like to have more information about your products.”
“Dear Demanding Customer” came the admission, “For the laundry detergent it does contained surfactant and optical brightener. The ingredients of products are confidential but what we can do is only to verify whether the particular contained in or not. By all the mean, we could not meet all of your requirement. Thanks and regards.”
So there you have an ‘environmental friendly’ detergent supplier that cannot substantiate their claims. Exposing claims as false is easy if you have little information about which of the typical ingredients of detergent may not be environmentally friendly.
Finding genuine environmentally friendly detergents is still the difficult bit. Luckily suppliers are starting to respond to demand from awkward customers and either importing western brands into the Asia region or better, starting to make their own. If you can’t find one of these brands right away at least you can learn how to recognise one when you do see it.
Glossary
LAS: Linear Alkyl Sodium Sulfonates
SLS: Sodium Lauryl Sulphate
For further information about ingredients of laundry detergents I have dug out three websites each with a different bias.
Pro alternative detergent
Pro conventional detergent
Unbiased
Related posts
A new coffee table book is out on the subject of ‘Architecture in Sabah, Resorts and Hotels’. Arkitrek is very chuffed to have our work at Borneo Rainforest Lodge featured in a multiple page spread. Thanks to Author Richard Nelson Sokial for the namecheck and complimentary words and pictures. All that assiduous buttering up obviously didn’t go unnoticed.
Arriving in Sabah for the first time nearly six years ago, my first impression of the architecture was monotypic concrete shoplots and suburban houses that seemed to aspire to a 1980’s TV set from America. In a part of the world where the excruciatingly trendy bali style, magnificent temples and crumbling colonial urbanism rule the roost, it takes a while to tune into demure local culture.
Since I first met him, Richard has been eloquantly and pursuasively banging the drum for Sabah architectural heritage. He has been fervently cataloging what remains of vernacular architecture before it is lost and tirelessly teaching Sabahans to value their own building culture.
‘Architecture in Sabah, Resorts and Hotels’ is not an obvious choice of reference book for international architectural scholars. It’s strength is in celebrating what is best in Sabah and building local confidence. In this respect I think it will become a benchmark book (it’s certainly the first of its kind) and will help to encourage subjects for a follow up book.
* * * * *
The best place to read about the book and other Sabah architectural heritage stories is on Richard’s own blog
You can buy the book from Borneo Books in Kota Kinabalu
Related posts
Tags: Architectural Heritage, Architecture, Borneo Rainforest Lodge, Hotels, Malaysia, PAM, Resorts, Richard Nelson Sokial, Sabah
Since 2006 we have been working on the renovation of Borneo Rainforest Lodge. 24 of the 31 rooms are complete and we have finally started the Big One – renovation of the Main Lodge building itself.
This is a big deal because it means shutting down the hotel for over two months and doing a major shopfitting type job under difficult conditions.
Shop fitting type; because work will progress around the clock to minimise the closure time.
Difficult conditions; in normal weather it takes a 4WD lorry 4 hours to reach the lodge. Right now it is the rainy season meaning the road is a quagmire and two bridges are down making the journey impassable to all but small pick-up trucks.
So far the contractor has succeeded in pulling the lodge apart and now has two months in which to put it back together!
Related posts
Tags: Borneo Nature Tours, Borneo Rainforest Lodge, Danum Valley, Malaysia, Nature Tourism, Renovation, Sabah
Text by Billy Dunn
Photos by Billy Dunn and Ian Hall
The construction of the biogas digester at the new Sun Bear Conservation Centre in Sepilok took a bit of time to get running and underway but after ten days of hard building, pumping, lifting, grafting, sweating, itching, bleeding, plastering, twisting, bending and cutting, it was an impressive achievement thanks to the volunteers from Camps International.
After arriving in Sepilok the initial tasks facing the group were not too exciting or enjoyable but hard labour and exhausting work! We started by moving 1500 bricks from outside to inside the site, which involved a lot of timber planks, deep clay resembling a battlefield full of water and wheelbarrows with punctured wheels…not a good combination for moving bricks!
To follow, the excavated location on site for the digester was full of water. After trying to convince the girls that bailing the water out with buckets all day was the only solution, the contractors, having seen their faces, gladly lent us their pump and the water was gone soon enough.
Once the site was clean and dry, the concrete platform was revealed beneath the water and leaves. We then moved a third of the bricks down our own hand made steps, carved out from the clay, and into the centre of the circle, only to realise that the centre of the circle was actually required to draw and mark out the circular footprint for the bricks! After a brief re-location, to the girl’s delight of course, we laid out the first course. With a quick lesson in the art of bricklaying by leader Howard, we quickly learnt that bricklaying was indeed an art and not as easy as maybe expected previously!
We soon developed an effective production line of sand/cement mixing, water collecting, concrete mixing, bucket filling and distributing down the steps to the site. This was all being done in sticky wet clay, hot, humid conditions and with every builder working in Sepilok staring at our every move. Well I say “our” every move, as lovely as Matt and I are, I’m pretty sure it had something to do with all the girls working on site! The builders’ entertainment eventually turned to frustration with our bricklaying skills and they soon joined us down in the pit. A solid afternoon’s work with the contractors got us back on track and we were soon motoring on with the construction.
The arrival of the remainder of the group brought an injection of enthusiasm, plus the skills of their leaders Mann and Zul. Our initial attempts to build the dome for the digester were not as successful as we maybe first thought. Despite it being our first experience bending metal bars into circles and arcs, we were relatively happy and satisfied with our efforts. That is until Mann took one look at it and worked his magic! His construction experience was clear to see as he took our “dome” apart and began amending our “arches” into curved things of beauty! When re-attached and covered with steel mesh, the finished dome was an impressive sight.
The moment of truth came when the dome was placed onto the brick structure to find out how well it would fit. It sat perfectly and the steel circular rings were attached using the vertical metal rods bedded in between the double skin of bricks. A hard mornings work then began when the inside face of the dome was plastered, a very messy and tiring job but one that was achieved successfully in one go. To complete the group’s work, the outside face was then plastered in the afternoon and covered with damp blankets.
Without the efforts and hard grafting by the volunteers, the biofuel digester would still be a large pond on site. The group made great progress in the ten days and should be proud of the efforts! On behalf of BSBCC, I would like to thank Camps International for their contribution, as their work here will always be seen and felt by the centre for years to come.
Related posts
Tags: biogas, Borneo, Camp Borneo, Camps International, Malaysia, Sabah, sepilok, sun bear
Recent Comments